Dacia Dokker 2013 vs Citroen Berlingo 2015
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Dokker engine produces 30 HP less power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Citroen Berlingo. Due to the lower power, Dacia Dokker reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Dokker is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Dacia Dokker consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Dokker could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Dacia Dokker consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C4, Peugeot 3008, Opel Grandland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen Berlingo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Dokker 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Dokker 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Dacia Dokker is smaller, but slightly higher. Dacia Dokker is 2 cm shorter than the Citroen Berlingo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Dokker is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 800 litres | 100 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 100 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 800 litres | 675 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | 3000 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Dacia Dokker has more luggage space (by 125 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Dokker is 0.4 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Dacia Dokker can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`854 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Citroen Berlingo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Dokker has serious deffects in 170 percent more cases than Citroen Berlingo, so Citroen Berlingo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Dokker has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |