Cupra Tavascan 2023 vs Nissan X-Trail 2022
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Cupra Tavascan is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Cupra Tavascan also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | - | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 - 340 HP | 158 - 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 545 NM | 244 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.6 - 6.8 seconds | 7 - 9.6 seconds | |
| In general, Cupra Tavascan are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan X-Trail. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.2 - 7.6 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.73 m | |
| Cupra Tavascan is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Cupra Tavascan is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 585 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1424 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Cupra Tavascan has 45 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | ~ 2`302 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 33 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Cupra Tavascan has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |