Cupra Formentor 2024 vs Skoda Kamiq 2018
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Hybrid | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Cupra Formentor) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Skoda Kamiq) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Cupra Formentor is more dynamic to drive. Cupra Formentor engine produces 40 HP more power than Skoda Kamiq, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Skoda Kamiq. Thanks to more power Cupra Formentor reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 55 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Cupra Formentor is larger, but lower. Cupra Formentor is 6 cm longer than the Skoda Kamiq, 5 cm wider, while the height of Cupra Formentor is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1510 litres | |
|
Skoda Kamiq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Cupra Formentor uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`190 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 400 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Cupra Formentor has
|
Skoda Kamiq has
| |