Cupra Formentor 2024 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
Hybrid engines (Cupra Formentor) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Mazda CX-30) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 224 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Cupra Formentor is more dynamic to drive. Cupra Formentor engine produces 3 HP less power than Mazda CX-30, but torque is 26 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Despite less power, Cupra Formentor reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 48 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.45 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.51 m | 1.56 m | |
Cupra Formentor is larger, but lower. Cupra Formentor is 6 cm longer than the Mazda CX-30, 4 cm wider, while the height of Cupra Formentor is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1406 litres | |
Mazda CX-30 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Cupra Formentor has 85 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. This could mean that the Cupra Formentor uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`042 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 33 600 | 22 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Cupra Formentor has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |