Cupra Formentor 2021 vs Audi Q3 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Hybrid | 1.4 Hybrid | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
| Cupra Formentor and Audi Q3 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Cupra Formentor reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 | 1.7 | |
|
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Cupra Formentor consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Cupra Formentor could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 2100 km in combined cycle | 2640 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Cupra Formentor is smaller. Cupra Formentor is 2 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, width is practically the same , while the height of Cupra Formentor is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1415 litres | 1375 litres | |
| Cupra Formentor has 35 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Cupra Formentor (by 40 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Cupra Formentor is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Cupra Formentor can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`120 kg | 2`320 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`629 kg | 1`740 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 491 kg | 580 kg | |
| Cupra Formentor load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Audi Q3. Therefore, Audi Q3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | 30 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi Q3 has
| |