Cupra Ateca 2020 vs Skoda Karoq 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Cupra Ateca) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Skoda Karoq) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Cupra Ateca engine produces 150 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Skoda Karoq. Thanks to more power Cupra Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Cupra Ateca consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Cupra Ateca could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Cupra Ateca consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Karoq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Cupra Ateca and Skoda Karoq are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Cupra Ateca has 36 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Cupra Ateca is 0.1 metres less than that of the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`170 kg | 2`188 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`551 kg | 1`545 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 619 kg | 643 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 000 | 25 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Cupra Ateca has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |