Cupra Ateca 2020 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Cupra Ateca engine produces 150 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 203 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Cupra Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 6.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Cupra Ateca consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Cupra Ateca could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Cupra Ateca consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 540 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Cupra Ateca is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 3 cm wider, while the height of Cupra Ateca is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1206 litres | |
|
Cupra Ateca has more luggage capacity. Cupra Ateca has 79 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Cupra Ateca is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`170 kg | 1`970 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`551 kg | 1`475 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 619 kg | 495 kg | |
| Cupra Ateca load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Mitsubishi ASX. Therefore, Cupra Ateca is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 32 600 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Cupra Ateca has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |