Cupra Ateca 2020 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Cupra Ateca engine produces 150 HP more power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 187 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Thanks to more power Cupra Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.6 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Cupra Ateca consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Cupra Ateca could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-30 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eight 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-30 2019 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.56 m | |
| Cupra Ateca and Mazda CX-30 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1406 litres | |
|
Cupra Ateca has more luggage capacity. Cupra Ateca has 55 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Cupra Ateca is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 1`957 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 000 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Cupra Ateca has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |