Cupra Ateca 2020 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Cupra Ateca engine produces 120 HP more power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 176 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Thanks to more power Cupra Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.6 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Cupra Ateca consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Cupra Ateca could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.56 m | |
| Cupra Ateca and Mazda CX-30 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1406 litres | |
|
Cupra Ateca has more luggage capacity. Cupra Ateca has 55 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Cupra Ateca is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30, which means Cupra Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Cupra Ateca has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |