Cupra Ateca 2020 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Cupra Ateca) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Cupra Ateca engine produces 150 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Cupra Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Cupra Ateca consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Cupra Ateca could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Cupra Ateca consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Cupra Ateca is 3 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 550 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Cupra Ateca has 65 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Cupra Ateca uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Cupra Ateca is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Cupra Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 600 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Cupra Ateca has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |