Cupra Ateca 2020 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Cupra Ateca engine produces 60 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Thanks to more power Cupra Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| 540 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Cupra Ateca is 3 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 550 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Cupra Ateca has 65 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Cupra Ateca uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Cupra Ateca is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Cupra Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 600 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Cupra Ateca has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |