Cupra Ateca 2020 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Cupra Ateca) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Cupra Ateca engine produces 60 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, but torque is 100 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Thanks to more power Cupra Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.2 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Cupra Ateca consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Cupra Ateca could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
| Cupra Ateca is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Cupra Ateca is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1383 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Cupra Ateca uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Cupra Ateca is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Cupra Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`170 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 000 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Cupra Ateca has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |