Cupra Ateca 2020 vs BMW X2 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Cupra Ateca) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW X2) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Cupra Ateca engine produces 110 HP more power than BMW X2, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Cupra Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Cupra Ateca consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Cupra Ateca could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Cupra Ateca consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X2 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Cupra Ateca is larger. Cupra Ateca is 3 cm longer than the BMW X2, 2 cm wider, while the height of Cupra Ateca is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1355 litres | |
| Cupra Ateca has 15 litres more trunk space than the BMW X2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Cupra Ateca is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW X2, which means Cupra Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`170 kg | 2`190 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`551 kg | 1`600 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 619 kg | 590 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 800 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Cupra Ateca has
|
BMW X2 has
| |