Cupra Ateca 2020 vs BMW X1 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Cupra Ateca) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW X1) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Cupra Ateca engine produces 150 HP more power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 50 NM more than BMW X1. Thanks to more power Cupra Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Cupra Ateca consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Cupra Ateca could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Cupra Ateca consumes 4.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| BMW X1 2019 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X1 2019 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.60 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Cupra Ateca is 6 cm shorter than the BMW X1, 2 cm wider, while the height of Cupra Ateca is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1550 litres | |
| Cupra Ateca has 20 litres less trunk space than the BMW X1. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Cupra Ateca is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Cupra Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`125 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 30 600 | 28 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Cupra Ateca has
|
BMW X1 has
| |