Cupra Ateca 2018 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Cupra Ateca engine produces 137 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Cupra Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Cupra Ateca consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Cupra Ateca could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Cupra Ateca consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Cupra Ateca is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm wider, while the height of Cupra Ateca is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1585 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Cupra Ateca is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`150 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Cupra Ateca has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |