Cupra Ateca 2018 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Cupra Ateca) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Cupra Ateca engine produces 150 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Thanks to more power Cupra Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Cupra Ateca consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Cupra Ateca could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Cupra Ateca consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.66 m | |
| Cupra Ateca and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 575 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Cupra Ateca is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Cupra Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`150 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 20 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Cupra Ateca has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |