Cupra Ateca 2018 vs BMW X2 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Cupra Ateca) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW X2) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is more dynamic to drive. Cupra Ateca engine produces 110 HP more power than BMW X2, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Cupra Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Cupra Ateca consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Cupra Ateca could require 390 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Cupra Ateca consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Cupra Ateca is larger. Cupra Ateca is 2 cm longer than the BMW X2, 2 cm wider, while the height of Cupra Ateca is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1355 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Cupra Ateca is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW X2, which means Cupra Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`150 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Cupra Ateca has
|
BMW X2 has
| |