Cupra Ateca 2020 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cupra Ateca is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi ASX has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Cupra Ateca is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi ASX can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi ASX also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 117 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 154 - 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 10.2 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.1 - 7.7 | |
|
Cupra Ateca petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Cupra Ateca is larger, but slightly lower. Cupra Ateca is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 5 cm wider, while the height of Cupra Ateca is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1206 litres | |
|
Cupra Ateca has more luggage capacity. Cupra Ateca has 79 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Cupra Ateca is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`170 | ~ 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Cupra Ateca has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |