Cupra Ateca 2020 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cupra Ateca is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda CX-30 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Cupra Ateca is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda CX-30 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-30 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda CX-30 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 116 - 189 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 213 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.4 - 6.4 | |
|
Cupra Ateca petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-30. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 175 - 180 mm (6.9 - 7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.56 m | |
| Cupra Ateca and Mazda CX-30 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1406 litres | |
|
Cupra Ateca has more luggage capacity. Cupra Ateca has 55 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Cupra Ateca is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30, which means Cupra Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`170 | ~ 1`986 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 23 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Cupra Ateca has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |