Cupra Ateca 2020 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Cupra Ateca is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (diesel, hybrid) | |
| Cupra Ateca is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 150 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 260 - 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 6.4 - 11.2 seconds | |
| In general, Cupra Ateca are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 1.9 - 8.1 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
| Cupra Ateca is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Cupra Ateca is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1383 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Cupra Ateca has 106 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Cupra Ateca uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Cupra Ateca is 1.1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Cupra Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`170 | ~ 2`492 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 600 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Cupra Ateca has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |