Citroen Xsara 1998 vs Chrysler Neon 1997
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 193 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara engine produces 34 HP more power than Chrysler Neon, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Chrysler Neon. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Neon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 19 cm shorter than the Chrysler Neon, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |