Citroen Xsara 1999 vs Chrysler Neon 1997
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Neon is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 43 HP less power than Chrysler Neon, but torque is 31 NM more than Chrysler Neon. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Stratus, Dodge Neon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen Xsara is 19 cm shorter than the Chrysler Neon, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |