Citroen Xsara 1998 vs Seat Cordoba 2000

 
Citroen Xsara
1998 - 2000
Seat Cordoba
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 112 HP156 HP
Torque: 155 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds7.9 seconds
Seat Cordoba is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Xsara engine produces 44 HP less power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Seat Cordoba. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.37.8
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Citroen Xsara consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle570 km in combined cycle
850 km on highway750 km on highway
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.17 m4.16 m
Width: 1.70 m1.64 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower.
Citroen Xsara is 1 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Cordoba.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Seat Cordoba has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably better
Average price (€): 800no data
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Seat Cordoba has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv