Citroen Xsara 1998 vs Seat Cordoba 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Seat Cordoba is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 53 HP less power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 57 NM less than Seat Cordoba. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 7.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.8 | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Xsara is 1 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |