Citroen Xsara 1998 vs Honda Civic 1996
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 103 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 153 NM | 140 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
Honda Civic is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 2 HP less power than Honda Civic, but torque is 13 NM more than Honda Civic. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.1 | |
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
780 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.17 m | 4.46 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
Citroen Xsara is 29 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 405 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.7 metres more than that of the Honda Civic, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`550 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Honda Civic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Honda Civic, so Honda Civic quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Honda Civic has
| |