Citroen Xsara 1998 vs Opel Tigra 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Citroen Xsara and Opel Tigra have the same engine power, but Citroen Xsara torque is 10 NM more than Opel Tigra. Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.3 | |
|
The Opel Tigra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Tigra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger. Citroen Xsara is 25 cm longer than the Opel Tigra, 10 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 425 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres more than that of the Opel Tigra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`330 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Opel Tigra has
| |