Citroen Xsara 1998 vs Chrysler Neon 1997
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Neon is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 40 HP less power than Chrysler Neon, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Chrysler Neon. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.3 | |
|
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen Xsara is 19 cm shorter than the Chrysler Neon, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |