Citroen Xsara 1998 vs Toyota Paseo 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 112 NM | 130 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Toyota Paseo is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 15 HP less power than Toyota Paseo, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Toyota Paseo. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.3 | |
Citroen Xsara consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Paseo, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.17 m | 4.16 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.29 m | |
Citroen Xsara is larger. Citroen Xsara is 1 cm longer than the Toyota Paseo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 278 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Paseo, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`385 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Toyota Paseo has
| |