Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Seat Cordoba 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 193 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Citroen Xsara engine produces 11 HP more power than Seat Cordoba, but torque is 17 NM less than Seat Cordoba. Despite the higher power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 7.8 | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Xsara is 3 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |