Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 193 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara 2000 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara 2000 engine produces 30 HP more power than Citroen Xsara 2000, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Citroen Xsara 2000. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 7.7 | |
|
The Citroen Xsara 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara 2000 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara 2000 could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Citroen Xsara 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara 2000 and Citroen Xsara 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |