Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Hyundai Coupe 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Citroen Xsara) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Hyundai Coupe) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 139 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Coupe is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 49 HP less power than Hyundai Coupe, but torque is 23 NM more than Hyundai Coupe. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 510 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Lantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller, but higher. Citroen Xsara is 15 cm shorter than the Hyundai Coupe, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 362 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.3 metres less than that of the Hyundai Coupe. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Hyundai Coupe has
| |