Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Skoda Fabia 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 137 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara engine produces 22 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Xsara is 15 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 426 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1225 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`660 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
| |