Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Skoda Fabia 2001

 
Citroen Xsara
2000 - 2003
Skoda Fabia
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP64 HP
Torque: 205 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds18.3 seconds
Citroen Xsara is more dynamic to drive.
Citroen Xsara engine produces 26 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 6.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.54.8
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km4.9 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway1120 km on highway
910 km with real consumption910 km with real consumption
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.22 m
Width: 1.70 m1.65 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower.
Citroen Xsara is 15 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data426 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1225 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`675
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Citroen Xsara has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Fabia, so Citroen Xsara quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10001000
Rating in user reviews: 8.4/10 8.8/10
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv