Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Skoda Fabia 2001

 
Citroen Xsara
2000 - 2003
Skoda Fabia
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 71 HP64 HP
Torque: 125 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16 seconds18.3 seconds
Citroen Xsara is more dynamic to drive.
Citroen Xsara engine produces 7 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.24.8
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Citroen Xsara consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 210 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 870 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
1080 km on highway1120 km on highway
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.22 m
Width: 1.70 m1.65 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower.
Citroen Xsara is 15 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data426 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1225 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`675
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Citroen Xsara has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Fabia, so Citroen Xsara quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10001000
Rating in user reviews: 8.4/10 8.8/10
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv