Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Skoda Fabia 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 71 HP | 64 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 125 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 18.3 seconds | |
Citroen Xsara is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara engine produces 7 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 4.8 | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
1080 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.22 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Xsara is 15 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 426 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1225 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`675 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | average | |
Citroen Xsara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Fabia, so Citroen Xsara quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |