Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Skoda Fabia 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 15.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara engine produces 42 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen Xsara consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Citroen Xsara 2000 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen Xsara 2000 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Xsara is 15 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 426 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1225 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`615 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Citroen Xsara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Fabia, so Citroen Xsara quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
| |