Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Citroen Xsara 1997
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara 2000 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara 2000 engine produces 20 HP more power than Citroen Xsara 1997, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Citroen Xsara 1997. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Xsara 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xsara 2000 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara 1997, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara 2000 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara 1997. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Peugeot 206, Peugeot 306, Citroen Xsara Picasso, Peugeot 106 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara 2000 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen Xsara 2000 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Citroen Xsara 2000 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen Xsara 2000 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Citroen Xsara 2000 is 20 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara 1997, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Xsara 2000 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |