Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Audi A3 2000
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 120 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 27 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Audi A3. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
800 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 460'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A3 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 2 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen Berlingo | Used also on Volkswagen Golf | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Audi A3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.15 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
Citroen Xsara is 22 cm longer than the Audi A3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1110 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi A3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`650 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A3 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Audi A3 has
| |