Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Mercedes E class 2003

 
Citroen Xsara
2003 - 2005
Mercedes E class
2003 - 2006
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.1 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 90 HP122 HP
Torque: 205 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds12 seconds
Citroen Xsara engine produces 32 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Mercedes E class. Despite less power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.55.9
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km6.1 l/100km
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway1350 km on highway
910 km with real consumption1060 km with real consumption
Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Citroen Xsara) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Engine production duration: 7 years8 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes Vito
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.82 m
Width: 1.70 m1.82 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Citroen Xsara is smaller.
Citroen Xsara is 45 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data540 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1002`135
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Citroen Xsara has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mercedes E class, so Citroen Xsara quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 8003000
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Mercedes E klase has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv