Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Mercedes E class 2003
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 122 HP | |
Torque: | 205 NM | 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Citroen Xsara engine produces 32 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Mercedes E class. Despite less power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
1250 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
910 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Citroen Xsara) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes Vito | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 45 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 540 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 2`135 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Citroen Xsara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mercedes E class, so Citroen Xsara quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |