Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Peugeot 406 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 406 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 19 HP less power than Peugeot 406, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Peugeot 406. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.9 | |
| Citroen Xsara consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 406, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 37 cm shorter than the Peugeot 406, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 526 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1740 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.8 metres less than that of the Peugeot 406, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Peugeot 406 has
| |