Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Peugeot 307 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 307 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 19 HP less power than Peugeot 307, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Peugeot 307. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.4 | |
|
The Peugeot 307 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 307 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 5 cm shorter than the Peugeot 307, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1540 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.3 metres less than that of the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`984 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 307 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Peugeot 307 has
| |