Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Mercedes E class 2003
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 51 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 145 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.9 | |
| Citroen Xsara consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Citroen Xsara) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 45 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 540 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 2`135 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Citroen Xsara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mercedes E class, so Citroen Xsara quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |