Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Citroen Xsara engine produces 15 HP more power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.5 | |
| Citroen Xsara consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.64 m | |
| Citroen Xsara is 9 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`000 kg | 900 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
| |