Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Peugeot 406 2002

 
Citroen Xsara
2003 - 2004
Peugeot 406
2002 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.7 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP117 HP
Torque: 120 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds11.8 seconds
Peugeot 406 is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Xsara engine produces 42 HP less power than Peugeot 406, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Peugeot 406. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.77.9
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Citroen Xsara consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 406, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle880 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1120 km on highway
Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.74 m
Width: 1.70 m1.76 m
Height: 1.42 m1.46 m
Citroen Xsara is smaller.
Citroen Xsara is 37 cm shorter than the Peugeot 406, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data525 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1740 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 406, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1002`015
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 800no data
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • lower fuel consumption
Peugeot 406 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv