Citroen Xsara 2004 vs Alfa Romeo 156 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Citroen Xsara engine produces 47 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 156, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Alfa Romeo 156. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 63 litres | |
| 1030 km with real consumption | 1050 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 6 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 156, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1180 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.9 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`815 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Alfa Romeo 156 has
| |