Citroen Xsara 2004 vs Peugeot 406 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.7 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Citroen Xsara) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Peugeot 406) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Citroen Xsara engine produces 49 HP less power than Peugeot 406, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Peugeot 406. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 70 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 37 cm shorter than the Peugeot 406, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1740 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 406, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`015 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Peugeot 406 has
| |