Citroen Xsara 1999 vs Nissan Almera 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 136 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara engine produces 36 HP more power than Nissan Almera, whereas torque is 44 NM more than Nissan Almera. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.2 | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, 1 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 340 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`595 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Nissan Almera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Nissan Almera, so Nissan Almera quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |