Citroen Xsara 1999 vs Audi A3 1996

 
Citroen Xsara
1999 - 2000
Audi A3
1996 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 135 HP125 HP
Torque: 180 NM173 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds9.6 seconds
Citroen Xsara engine produces 10 HP more power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Audi A3. Despite the higher power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.78.3
Citroen Xsara consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway870 km on highway
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.17 m4.15 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Citroen Xsara is 2 cm longer than the Audi A3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1110 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi A3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`650
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 6001000
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • more power
  • lower price
Audi A3 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv