Citroen Xsara 1999 vs Fiat Brava 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 144 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara engine produces 32 HP more power than Fiat Brava, whereas torque is 36 NM more than Fiat Brava. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.8 | |
|
The Fiat Brava is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Brava, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 2 cm shorter than the Fiat Brava, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 775 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.3 metres more than that of the Fiat Brava. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`630 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Brava has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Fiat Brava has
| |