Citroen Xsara 1999 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara 2000 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara 1999 engine produces 2 HP less power than Citroen Xsara 2000, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Citroen Xsara 2000. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara 1999 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.7 | |
|
The Citroen Xsara 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara 1999 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara 1999 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Citroen Xsara 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara 1999 is 2 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara 2000, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |