Citroen Xsara 1997 vs Fiat Brava 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.2 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Brava is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 37 HP less power than Fiat Brava, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Fiat Brava. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 6.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.5 | |
|
The Fiat Brava is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Brava, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| Fiat Brava gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 2 cm shorter than the Fiat Brava, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 775 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`735 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Brava has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Fiat Brava has
| |